<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple&#8217;s One More Thing: Safari on Windows</title>
	<link>http://www.surfionline.com/archives/2007/06/12/apples-one-more-thing-safari-on-windows/</link>
	<description>Chris Boulton</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 00:25:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.surfionline.com/archives/2007/06/12/apples-one-more-thing-safari-on-windows/#comment-40280</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 20:31:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.surfionline.com/archives/2007/06/12/apples-one-more-thing-safari-on-windows/#comment-40280</guid>
		<description>Seems decent, though they have a decent ways to go on it. And the font smoothing honestly makes my eyes burn. You can turn it on Light but not off. I prefer not to have all my text blurred and painful to focus on. Perhaps it's just a rendering issue, I don't know, but I can't work with a browser that does requires the font to be like that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems decent, though they have a decent ways to go on it. And the font smoothing honestly makes my eyes burn. You can turn it on Light but not off. I prefer not to have all my text blurred and painful to focus on. Perhaps it&#8217;s just a rendering issue, I don&#8217;t know, but I can&#8217;t work with a browser that does requires the font to be like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://www.surfionline.com/archives/2007/06/12/apples-one-more-thing-safari-on-windows/#comment-40012</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 00:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.surfionline.com/archives/2007/06/12/apples-one-more-thing-safari-on-windows/#comment-40012</guid>
		<description>I installed it and I use it more often than Firefox now :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I installed it and I use it more often than Firefox now <img src='http://www.surfionline.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alephresh</title>
		<link>http://www.surfionline.com/archives/2007/06/12/apples-one-more-thing-safari-on-windows/#comment-39986</link>
		<dc:creator>alephresh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2007 04:29:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.surfionline.com/archives/2007/06/12/apples-one-more-thing-safari-on-windows/#comment-39986</guid>
		<description>Hmm, I was a bit tired when I wrote my first comment. I guess it's not &lt;i&gt;that&lt;/i&gt; bad. People seem to like it and stuff. I guess it's really not optimized for old PCs, so that makes my experience very bad. (I'm actually using a 633 MHz Celeron with 256 MiB SDR... :P)

But it &lt;i&gt;does&lt;/i&gt; hang each time I visit http://www.ynet.co.il/ (for example), so I wouldn't say it's more stable than WL Messenger... Oh, and it shows Hebrew page titles backwards. It just doesn't seem ready for public beta.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, I was a bit tired when I wrote my first comment. I guess it&#8217;s not <i>that</i> bad. People seem to like it and stuff. I guess it&#8217;s really not optimized for old PCs, so that makes my experience very bad. (I&#8217;m actually using a 633 MHz Celeron with 256 MiB SDR&#8230; :P)</p>
<p>But it <i>does</i> hang each time I visit <a href="http://www.ynet.co.il/" rel="nofollow">http://www.ynet.co.il/</a> (for example), so I wouldn&#8217;t say it&#8217;s more stable than WL Messenger&#8230; Oh, and it shows Hebrew page titles backwards. It just doesn&#8217;t seem ready for public beta.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: .Lou</title>
		<link>http://www.surfionline.com/archives/2007/06/12/apples-one-more-thing-safari-on-windows/#comment-39961</link>
		<dc:creator>.Lou</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 16:31:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.surfionline.com/archives/2007/06/12/apples-one-more-thing-safari-on-windows/#comment-39961</guid>
		<description>There's so many people that are bashing it, simply because it's an Apple product. Personally, I think it looks really good and works quite well considering it's beta. In my opinion, it's already more stable than Windows Live Messenger. One thing though, I think it uses too much ram.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s so many people that are bashing it, simply because it&#8217;s an Apple product. Personally, I think it looks really good and works quite well considering it&#8217;s beta. In my opinion, it&#8217;s already more stable than Windows Live Messenger. One thing though, I think it uses too much ram.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alephresh</title>
		<link>http://www.surfionline.com/archives/2007/06/12/apples-one-more-thing-safari-on-windows/#comment-39954</link>
		<dc:creator>alephresh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 15:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.surfionline.com/archives/2007/06/12/apples-one-more-thing-safari-on-windows/#comment-39954</guid>
		<description>Well, the Windows beta fails miserably. Hangs, crazy resource usage, alienated/slow/buggy GUI, weird text rendering... Apple could learn a thing or two about cross-platform-ness from Mozilla or Opera. Also, Opera is far more configurable and customizable. How is this the best browser in the world? :P

Anyway, though I like Apple, I'm not crazy about the whole idea of Safari. They adhere to Web standards, so why not support Mozilla like Google does? I think this segmentation of good browsers and layout engines (Mozilla/Apple/Opera) just makes it harder to compete with the IE monopoly. (The same thing can be said about the plethora of Linux distributions.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, the Windows beta fails miserably. Hangs, crazy resource usage, alienated/slow/buggy GUI, weird text rendering&#8230; Apple could learn a thing or two about cross-platform-ness from Mozilla or Opera. Also, Opera is far more configurable and customizable. How is this the best browser in the world? <img src='http://www.surfionline.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Anyway, though I like Apple, I&#8217;m not crazy about the whole idea of Safari. They adhere to Web standards, so why not support Mozilla like Google does? I think this segmentation of good browsers and layout engines (Mozilla/Apple/Opera) just makes it harder to compete with the IE monopoly. (The same thing can be said about the plethora of Linux distributions.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tikitiki</title>
		<link>http://www.surfionline.com/archives/2007/06/12/apples-one-more-thing-safari-on-windows/#comment-39950</link>
		<dc:creator>Tikitiki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 03:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.surfionline.com/archives/2007/06/12/apples-one-more-thing-safari-on-windows/#comment-39950</guid>
		<description>I definitely like it :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I definitely like it <img src='http://www.surfionline.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: musicalmidget</title>
		<link>http://www.surfionline.com/archives/2007/06/12/apples-one-more-thing-safari-on-windows/#comment-39947</link>
		<dc:creator>musicalmidget</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2007 23:40:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.surfionline.com/archives/2007/06/12/apples-one-more-thing-safari-on-windows/#comment-39947</guid>
		<description>Just downloaded and installed Safari now.  Looks very nice indeed.  I'm sure I'll have fun playing with it for a while.

Good job you posted this.  I might not have found out about the release for quite some time if not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just downloaded and installed Safari now.  Looks very nice indeed.  I&#8217;m sure I&#8217;ll have fun playing with it for a while.</p>
<p>Good job you posted this.  I might not have found out about the release for quite some time if not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
